Introduction

A variety of techniques for measuring finger range of motion (ROM) are available for hand therapist use, however, there is no clear description of which finger ROM methods are preferred in practice. This study explored the preferred measurement techniques, the factors influencing clinical decision-making, and the clinical reasoning processes employed when faced with practice-based measurement scenarios.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional online survey study of hand therapists and American or Canadian Society of Hand Therapists members. Quantitative methods were employed for participant demographics and categorical clinical questions about practice patterns. Qualitative descriptive questions and vignettes were analysed using inductive and deductive content analysis, respectively.

Results

Four hundred and eighty-one responses were included, representing hand therapists with a median age of 51 years and median experience of 19 years. Participants preferred measuring individual joints with a goniometer (N = 210, 44%) for perceived utility in informing treatment decisions, reliability, and confidence in measurement skills. Participants also preferred active functional ROM (N = 117, 24%) for being quick, easy, and useful in informing treatment decisions. Participants reported using different methods with time constraints in a busy clinic, taking precautions with pins/wounds, bulky dressings/casts, pain tolerance levels of patients, or with specific pathologies. Participants’ responses to the multi-stage vignette identified distinct patterns of clinical reasoning approaches within individual vignettes.

Conclusions

Hand therapists use multiple methods to measure finger ROM while preferring to use goniometers to measure individual finger joints. They engage procedural and pragmatic reasoning modified by contextual factors when measuring finger ROM.

Fig 7 a, d-f

Categories

Keywords

Licence