Table_1_The Internet-Based Conversational Engagement Clinical Trial (I-CONECT) in Socially Isolated Adults 75+ Years Old: Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol and COVID-19 Related Study Modifications.docx
Background: Increasing social interactions through communication technologies could offer a cost-effective prevention approach that slows cognitive decline and delays the onset of Alzheimer's disease. This paper describes the protocol of an active project named “Internet-based conversational engagement clinical trial (I-CONECT)” (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02871921). The COVID-19 pandemic related protocol modifications are also addressed in the current paper.
Methods: I-CONECT is a multi-site, assessor-blind, randomized controlled behavioral intervention trial (RCT). We aim to randomize 320 socially isolated adults 75+ years old [160 Caucasian and 160 African American participants, 50:50 split between those with normal cognition and mild cognitive impairment (MCI)] recruited from the community to either the video chat intervention group or the control group (1:1 allocation). Those in the video chat group receive a computer and Internet service for the duration of the study, which they use to video chat with study staff for 30 min/day 4×/week for 6 months (high dose), and then 2×/week for an additional 6 months (maintenance dose). Both video chat and control groups have a brief (about 10 min) telephone check-in with study staff once per week. The primary outcome is the change in global cognitive function measured by Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) from baseline to 6 months. Secondary outcomes include changes in cognition in memory and executive function domains, emotional well-being measured by NIH Toolbox emotional battery, and daily functional abilities assessed with the Revised Observed Tasks of Daily Living (OTDL-R). Eligible participants have MRIs at baseline and 6 months. Participants contribute saliva for genetic testing (optional consent), and all video chats, weekly check-in calls and neuropsychological assessment sessions are recorded for speech and language analysis. The pandemic halted research activities and resulted in protocol modifications, including replacing in-person assessment with remote assessment, remote deployment of study equipment, and revised targeted sample size.
Discussion: This trial provides user-friendly hardware for the conversational-based intervention that can be easily provided at participants' homes. The trial aspires to use age and culture-specific conversational materials and a related platform developed in this trial for enhancing cognitive reserve and improving cognitive function.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1177/1745691614568352
- https://doi.org//10.1017/S1041610213001750
- https://doi.org//10.3233/JAD-180501
- https://doi.org//10.1002/gps.4495
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30367-6
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.03.004
- https://doi.org//10.1093/geronb/60.6.P320
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70417-3
- https://doi.org//10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.2657
- https://doi.org//10.1093/geronb/59.6.P278
- https://doi.org//10.1017/S1041610212002086
- https://doi.org//10.1093/geronb/58.2.S93
- https://doi.org//10.1093/geront/gnz063
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.trci.2015.01.001
- https://doi.org//10.1177/0956797613499592
- https://doi.org//10.1093/geront/46.4.503
- https://doi.org//10.1177/0164027504268574
- https://doi.org//10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4
- https://doi.org//10.2307/2533283
- https://doi.org//10.1001/jama.2010.1510
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53221.x
- https://doi.org//10.1212/WNL.0b013e318230208a
- https://doi.org//10.1001/archneur.65.8.1091
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.004
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.005
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.008
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jalz.2011.03.003
- https://doi.org//10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063
- https://doi.org//10.1348/0144665031752934
- https://doi.org//10.1186/1745-6215-15-508
- https://doi.org//10.1093/geroni/igz038.827
- https://doi.org//10.1093/geroni/igaa057.3502
- https://doi.org//10.1097/WAD.0000000000000223
- https://doi.org//10.1002/trc2.12103
- https://doi.org//10.1159/000487131
- https://doi.org//10.1016/0197-4580(95)02002-0
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02797
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.trci.2017.10.004
- https://doi.org//10.1177/0733464804273772
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S0197-2456(01)00139-8
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.03.025
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.biopsych.2012.11.028
- https://doi.org//10.1162/jocn.2009.21282
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.03.005
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fnagi.2015.00232
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41598-020-61994-0
- https://doi.org//10.18653/v1/2020.nlpmc-1.9
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.trci.2017.01.006
- https://doi.org//10.1212/WNL.0b013e318207b1b9
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.pneurobio.2011.08.014
- https://doi.org//10.1212/WNL.43.11.2412-a
- https://doi.org//10.1097/WAD.0000000000000228
- https://doi.org//10.12740/PP/45368
- https://doi.org//10.1002/trc2.12109