figshare
Browse
iope_a_1516786_sm9023.docx (12.64 kB)

Comparative Effectiveness of Generic Latanoprost Versus Branded Prostaglandin Analogs for Primary Open Angle Glaucoma

Download (12.64 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2018-09-06, 20:05 authored by Diana H. Kim, Victoria M. Addis, Wei Pan, Brian L. VanderBeek

Purpose: The purpose of the study is to determine the comparative effectiveness of generic latanoprost (GL) to its branded (BL) counterpart and other brand-name prostaglandin analogs (bPGAs) in preventing the need for additional therapy in the treatment of primary open angle glaucoma (POAG).

Methods: Retrospective cohort study using US commercial medical claims data. All new POAG patients from 2000 to 2015 who initiated treatment with either GL or BL were included. Exclusion occurred for having less than 2 years of time in the plan prior to diagnosis, previous use of glaucoma medications, or any diagnosis of glaucoma other than POAG at any time. Analyses compared GL to BL and also to those who received any branded PGA after 2011 (when the generic became available). Cox proportional hazard regression was used to assess the hazards of filling a prescription for a second IOP-lowering medication or having surgical intervention, individually and either outcome combined.

Results: A total of 6317 and 4150 POAG patients were treated with GL and BL, respectively. After 2010, 6317 GL and 3703 brand-name prostaglandin analog (bPGA) POAG patients met criteria for inclusion. After adjustment, compared to BL, the GL conferred a reduced hazard of having a glaucoma procedure performed (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.62–0.84, p < 0.001) and the combined outcome (HR = 0.90, 95% CI: 0.83–0.97, p = 0.006) but was not associated with having a second IOP medication (HR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.87–1.03, p = 0.18). Compared to the bPGAs, however, GL conferred a reduced hazard in each comparison (second IOP medication HR = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.81–0.94, p < 0.001; surgery HR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.61–0.81, p < 0.001; combined HR = 0.85, 95% CI: 0.79–0.92, p < 0.001). Sensitivity analyses confirmed these findings.

Conclusions: GL was no less and possibly more effective in preventing the need for additional intervention than branded PGAs.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Eye Institute K23 Award [1K23EY025729-01] and University of Pennsylvania Core Grant for Vision Research [2P30EY001583-41]. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH. Additional funding was provided by Research to Prevent Blindness and the Paul and Evanina Mackall Foundation. Funding from each of the above sources was received in the form of block research grants to the Scheie Eye Institute. None of the organizations had any role in the design or conduction of the study.

History

Usage metrics

    Ophthalmic Epidemiology

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC