Instruments for the case study "Continuously assessing and improving software quality with software analytics tools"
This collection is shared privately
To support the evaluation design in the study "Continuously assessing and improving software quality with software analytics tools", the researchers used the following six instruments during the evaluation:
1. Informed consent and demographics form.
2. A document comprising the specification of the QM (e.g., strategic indicators).
3. The task description consisting of specific scenarios to assess and improve the software quality of the products in which the participants were involved on a daily basis.
4. The questionnaire to collect practitioners’ perception regarding the use of the Q-Rapids tool.
5. Presentation and moderation guidelines for the researchers to conduct a debriefing session about the strengths of the current tool and any suggestions for improvement.
6. The observation protocol where the observers recorded start time, attendees, end time, activities/events/deviations/disruptions, timestamp, and memos.
1. Informed consent and demographics form.
2. A document comprising the specification of the QM (e.g., strategic indicators).
3. The task description consisting of specific scenarios to assess and improve the software quality of the products in which the participants were involved on a daily basis.
4. The questionnaire to collect practitioners’ perception regarding the use of the Q-Rapids tool.
5. Presentation and moderation guidelines for the researchers to conduct a debriefing session about the strengths of the current tool and any suggestions for improvement.
6. The observation protocol where the observers recorded start time, attendees, end time, activities/events/deviations/disruptions, timestamp, and memos.
FUNDING
Q-Rapids (Quality-aware rapid software development), EU H2020 research and innovation programme, grant agreement number 732253.
COLLECTION SIZE
4.37 MB