figshare
Browse

Paul Wouters

Professor of Scientometrics (Economics; Education)

Leiden, Netherlands

Publications

  • NWA: zorg dat je er bij bent
  • Science and its significant other: Representing the humanities in bibliometric scholarship
  • András’ Contribution to Scientometrics
  • Obituary. Eugene Garfield (1925–2017)
  • Indicator frameworks for fostering open knowledge practices in science and scholarship.
  • New Research Indicators and their meaning for Open Science
  • De wetenschap maakt een verreikende gedaanteverandering door
  • Citation Metrics: A Primer on How (not) to Normalize
  • Column Zonder Titel
  • Professional and citizen bibliometrics: complementarities and ambivalences in the development and use of indicators-a state-of-the-art report
  • Introduction to the special issue of research evaluation with invited papers of the 19th International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, 3-5 September 2014, Leiden, the Netherlands
  • Digital Humanities Are a Two-Way Street
  • The elephant in the room: The problem of quantifying productivity in evaluative scientometrics
  • Competition in Science: Links Between Publication Pressure, Grant Pressure and the Academic Job Market
  • Analysis of Publications on Journal Impact Factor Over Time
  • Evaluative Inquiry: Engaging research evaluation analytically and strategically.
  • Mixed methods research: what it is and what it could be
  • Citations, Citation Indicators, and Research Quality: An Overview of Basic Concepts and Theories
  • Policy brief for scientific and scholarly publishers
  • The failure of a paradigm Henk F. Moed. Applied Evaluative Informetrics, Springer International Publishing (2017)
  • Comparing comparisons. On rankings and accounting in hospitals and universities
  • Europa loopt warm voor open science
  • Wiens agenda is het eigenlijk?
  • Using Google Scholar in research evaluation of humanities and social science programs: A comparison with Web of Science data
  • Do “altmetrics” correlate with citations? Extensive comparison of altmetric indicators with citations from a multidisciplinary perspective
  • Bibliometric analysis of output and impact based on CRIS data: a case study on the registered output of a Dutch university
  • Vastgoed universiteiten
  • Het mysterie van de allocatie
  • Onder druk drijft Europa uiteen
  • Rethinking impact factors: Better ways to judge a journal (comment)
  • Mendeley readership as a filtering tool to identify highly cited publications
  • Globalization and the Rise of Rankings
  • Semiotics and Citations
  • Samenleven Met Data: Verkenningen van Nieuwe Maatschappelijke Relaties
  • Rethinking Impact Factors: New Pathways in Journal Metrics
  • Onder druk
  • The mismeasurement of quality and impact
  • Column Zonder Titel
  • Column Zonder Titel
  • Indicator frameworks for fostering open knowledge practices in science and scholarship.
  • Ranglijsten
  • Evaluation practices and effects of indicator use—a literature review
  • Commentaar: Lessen van de UvA
  • How is science clicked on Twitter? Click metrics for Bitly short links to scientific publications
  • Exploring possibilities to use bibliometric data to monitor gold open access publishing at the national level
  • Bridging the Evaluation Gap
  • An extensive analysis of the presence of altmetric data for Web of Science publications across subject fields and research topics
  • From Eminent Men to Excellent Universities: University Rankings as Calculative Devices
  • The emergence of neuromarketing investigated through online public communications (2002–2008)
  • Social Media Metrics for New Research Evaluation
  • Assessing the impact of the publications read by the different Mendeley users: Is there any different pattern among users?
  • The creation of the Science Citation Index
  • The Metric Tide: Report of the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management
  • The metric tide: Literature review
  • Leiden Manifesto
  • Dekker gaat groen
  • Interdisciplinair onderzoek benadeeld door ranglijsten tijdschriften
  • The Leiden Ranking 2011/2012: Data collection, indicators, and interpretation.
  • The signs of science
  • Formally citing the web
  • Scientometrics in the context of probabilistic philosophy
  • How well developed are altmetrics? A cross-disciplinary analysis of the presence of 'alternative metrics' in scientific publications
  • Impact of research cultures on the use of digital library resources
  • Information-centered research for large-scale analyses of new information sources
  • Has price dream come true - Is scientometrics a hard science
  • Beyond the holy grail: From citation theory to indicator theories
  • Introduction - Proceedings of the 1996 Erasmus Workshop on Quantitative Approaches to Science & Technology Studies
  • Not another case study - A middle-range interrogation of ethnographic case studies in the exploration of E-science
  • Multiple presents: how search engines rewrite the past
  • Citation cycles and peer review cycles
  • What's the deal with the web/blogs/the next big technology: A key role for information science in e-social science research?
  • Counting publications and citations: Is more always better?
  • Turning working papers into journal articles: An exercise in microbibliometrics
  • The Leiden Manifesto for research metrics
  • An international framework to promote access to data
  • Disentangling the meaning of ‘altmetrics’: Content analysis of Web of Science scientific publications
  • De ranglijsten
  • Groot zijn de daden, niet de reputatie
  • Counting publications and citations: Is more always better? 14th International Conference of the International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics, Vienna
  • Writing history in the virtual knowledge studio for the humanities and social sciences
  • The thematic orientation of publications mentioned on social media
  • Garfield as alchemist
  • R&D peloton
  • Between texts and contexts: Advances in theories of citation? (a rejoinder)
  • What is the impact of the publications read by the different Mendeley users? Could they help to identify alternative types of impact? PLoS ALM Workshop, San Francisco
  • Broad altmetric analysis of Mendeley readerships through the academic status of the readers of scientific publication
  • How Should the Scientometrics of the Candidates be Assessed?
  • Bibliometrics
  • Publicatiedrang en citatiestress
  • Acumen Final Report
  • The Citation: From Culture to Infrastructure
  • Virtual Knowledge. Experimenting in the Humanities and Social Sciences
  • Wetenschapskaarten
  • Nieuwe THE ranking
  • Nieuwe machten
  • Debat ranglijsten universiteiten gaat nieuwe ronde in
  • Gebruik h-index niet
  • Uit de draaikolk van de rankings
  • De strijd om om de toegang tot wetenschappelijke publicaties lijkt zich te verharden
  • CWTS, nieuwe directeur, nieuwe agenda
  • E-research and methodological innovation in Dutch literary studies
  • Crisis or Critique
  • Counting publications and citations: Is more always better?
  • Do mendeley readership counts help to filter highly cited WoS publications better than average citation impact of journals (JCS)?
  • Analysis of journal impact factor research in time: Development of a specialty?
  • Next-Generation Metrics: Reponsible Metrics and Evaluation for Open Science. Report of the European Commission Expert Group on Altmetrics
  • Open Access publishing and citation impact - An international study
  • Is minder beter? - de paradox van wetenschapsvoorlichting
  • Sesam Open U
  • On multiplying methods in the field of research evaluation. 21st International Conference in Science & Technology Indicators, Valencia
  • Introduction to Virtual Knowledge
  • De Lange Mars
  • Google Scholar

Paul Wouters's public data