figshare
Browse
freeman-understandingedemocracy-2013.pdf (475.17 kB)

Understanding e-democracy: government-led initiatives for democratic reform

Download (475.17 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2013-01-01, 00:00 authored by Julie FreemanJulie Freeman, S Quirke
Information and communication technologies (ICTs) offer opportunities for greater civic participation in democratic reform. Government ICT use has, however, predominantly been associated with e-government applications that focus on one-way information provision and service delivery. This article distinguishes between e-government and processes of edemocracy, which facilitate active civic engagement through two-way, ongoing dialogue. It draws from participation initiatives undertaken in two case studies. The first highlights efforts to increase youth political engagement in the local government area of Milton Keynes in the United Kingdom. The second is Iceland’s constitutional crowdsourcing, an initiative intended to increase civic input into constitutional reform. These examples illustrate that, in order to maintain legitimacy in the networked environment, a change in governmental culture is required to enable open and responsive e-democracy practices. When coupled with traditional participation methods, processes of e-democracy facilitate widespread opportunities for civic involvement and indicate that digital practices should not be separated from the everyday operations of government. While online democratic engagement is a slowly evolving process, initial steps are being undertaken by governments that enable e-participation to shape democratic reform.

History

Journal

Journal of e-democracy and open government

Volume

5

Issue

2

Pagination

141 - 154

Publisher

Danube University Krems

Location

Krems, Austria

ISSN

2075-9517

Language

eng

Notes

Paper from the CeDEM13 (Conference for E-Democracy and Open Government 2013).

Publication classification

X Not reportable; C3.1 Non-refereed articles in a professional journal

Copyright notice

2013, Danube University Krems

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC