pone.0293324.s001.docx (19.99 kB)
This figure shows the percentage of studies in terms of risk of bias (Low risk in green; Some concerns in yellow; High risk in red) subdivided by RoB 2 scale macro-category.
journal contribution
posted on 2023-11-30, 19:07 authored by Giusi Figliano, Federico Manzi, Andrea Luna Tacci, Antonella Marchetti, Davide MassaroThis figure shows the percentage of studies in terms of risk of bias (Low risk in green; Some concerns in yellow; High risk in red) subdivided by RoB 2 scale macro-category.
History
Usage metrics
Keywords
standardized assessments restrictpreferred reporting itemsfour primary areasassessing bias risksocially assistive roboticssocial cognition skillssocial cognition domainspromising interdisciplinary approachovercome current limitationsreview protocol adheressocial assistive roboticsfeaturing samples diagnosede ., cognitiveanalyzed 193 articlessystematic review aimssocial roboticssystematic reviewpromising rolemethodological limitationsreview underscoresreview encompassessystematic reviewssocial interventionsxlink ">western countriestreating cognitivesix databasesrobotic researchersquantitative studiesprogramming usedpotential benefitsmitigate cognitiveintervention outcomesincreased collaborationinclusion criteriacontrol groupscognitive abilitiesclinical heterogeneityclinical groupaging populationageing society19 met
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC