figshare
Browse
2107.01425-1.pdf (2.4 MB)

TeV Emission of Galactic Plane Sources with HAWC and H.E.S.S.

Download (2.4 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2021-11-05, 09:46 authored by H Abdalla, F Aharonian, F Ait Benkhali, EO Angüner, C Arcaro, C Armand, T Armstrong, H Ashkar, M Backes, V Baghmanyan, V Barbosa Martins, A Barnacka, M Barnard, Y Becherini, D Berge, K Bernlöhr, B Bi, M Böttcher, C Boisson, J Bolmont, M De Bonyde Lavergne, M Breuhaus, R Brose, F Brun, P Brun, M Bryan, M Büchele, T Bulik, T Bylund, S Caroff, A Carosi, T Chand, S Chandra, A Chen, G Cotter, M Curyło, J Damascene Mbarubucyeye, ID Davids, J Davies, C Deil, J Devin, L Dirson, A Djannati-Ataï, A Dmytriiev, A Donath, V Doroshenko, L Dreyer, C Duffy, J Dyks, K Egberts, F Eichhorn, S Einecke, G Emery, JP Ernenwein, K Feijen, S Fegan, A Fiasson, G Fichet De Clairfontaine, G Fontaine, S Funk, M Füßling, S Gabici, YA Gallant, G Giavitto, L Giunti, D Glawion, JF Glicenstein, D Gottschall, MH Grondin, J Hahn, M Haupt, G Hermann, JA Hinton, W Hofmann, C Hoischen, TL Holch, M Holler, M Hörbe, D Horns, D Huber, M Jamrozy, D Jankowsky, F Jankowsky, I Jung-Richardt, E Kasai, MA Kastendieck, K Katarzyński, U Katz, D Khangulyan, B Khélifi, S Klepser, W Kluźniak, N Komin, R Konno, K Kosack, D Kostunin, M Kreter, G Lamanna, A Lemière, M Lemoine-Goumard, P. O'Brien, et. al.
The High Altitude Water Cherenkov (HAWC) observatory and the High Energy Stereoscopic System (H.E.S.S.) are two leading instruments in the ground-based very-high-energy γ-ray domain. HAWC employs the water Cherenkov detection (WCD) technique, while H.E.S.S. is an array of Imaging Atmospheric Cherenkov Telescopes (IACTs). The two facilities therefore differ in multiple aspects, including their observation strategy, the size of their field of view, and their angular resolution, leading to different analysis approaches. Until now, it has been unclear if the results of observations by both types of instruments are consistent: several of the recently discovered HAWC sources have been followed up by IACTs, resulting in a confirmed detection only in a minority of cases. With this paper, we go further and try to resolve the tensions between previous results by performing a new analysis of the H.E.S.S. Galactic plane survey data, applying an analysis technique comparable between H.E.S.S. and HAWC. Events above 1 TeV are selected for both data sets, the point-spread function of H.E.S.S. is broadened to approach that of HAWC, and a similar background estimation method is used. This is the first detailed comparison of the Galactic plane observed by both instruments. H.E.S.S. can confirm the γ-ray emission of four HAWC sources among seven previously undetected by IACTs, while the three others have measured fluxes below the sensitivity of the H.E.S.S. data set. Remaining differences in the overall γ-ray flux can be explained by the systematic uncertainties. Therefore, we confirm a consistent view of the γ-ray sky between WCD and IACT techniques.

History

Citation

2021 ApJ 917 6

Author affiliation

Department of Physics and Astronomy

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

Astrophysical Journal

Volume

917

Issue

1

Pagination

6

Publisher

American Astronomical Society

issn

0004-637X

eissn

1538-4357

Acceptance date

2021-04-07

Copyright date

2021

Available date

2022-08-09

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC