pgph.0000028.s001.pdf (3.25 MB)
Supplementary text including the following supplementary tables and figures.
journal contribution
posted on 2022-01-19, 18:22 authored by Mark S. Graham, Anna May, Thomas Varsavsky, Carole H. Sudre, Benjamin Murray, Kerstin Kläser, Michela Antonelli, Liane S. Canas, Erika Molteni, Marc Modat, M. Jorge Cardoso, David A. Drew, Long H. Nguyen, Benjamin Rader, Christina Hu, Joan Capdevila, Alexander Hammers, Andrew T. Chan, Jonathan Wolf, John S. Brownstein, Tim D. Spector, Sebastien Ourselin, Claire J. Steves, Christina M. AstleyTable A: Zoe CSS questions. Table B: Zoe CSS testing survey questions. Table C: UMD Global COVID-19 Trends and Impact Survey questions. Table D: Comparison of question wording between Zoe and UMD-Facebook. Figure A: Testing trends. Table E: Comparison of Zoe survey respondents to all surveyed. Table F: Ability to recall symptoms in Zoe CSS survey. Table G: Understanding of testing criteria. Table H: Knowing where to test. Figure B: Qualitative demographic-knowledge relationships in UMD-CTIS. Figure C: Participant locations for UMD-CTIS.
(PDF)
History
Usage metrics
Keywords
symptom identification decreasedhighlight potential opportunitiesexamine united kingdom883 &# 8211599 &# 8211129 &# 8211including older age956 ), drawn237 ), nestedmaryland survey administeredamongst symptomatic umd19 pandemic responseevery decade olderqualifying symptoms rosectis ], ntesting gap maydecade older001 ),qualifying symptomsctis respondentstesting gapsymptomatic respondentssurvey respondentsnational symptomaticknowledge gapimpact survey19 trends19 testingevery 4years fewervs 85vs 84risk factorsone vsknowledge barriersfree testingfactors associatedfacebook usersever largerdecember 2020cited factor948 );933 ]).783 ]).746 ).292 ])001 ).
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC