figshare
Browse

sorry, we can't preview this file

rsbl20230043_si_001.docx (829.96 kB)

Supplementary Material from Downsized: gray whales using an alternative foraging ground have smaller morphology

Download (829.96 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-07-27, 04:51 authored by K. C. Bierlich, A. Kane, L. Hildebrand, I. Hildebrand, C. N. Bird, A. Fernandez Ajo, J. D. Stewart, J. Hewitt, J. Sumich, L. G. Torres
Describing individual morphology and growth is key for identifying ecological niches and monitoring the health and fitness of populations. Eastern North Pacific (ENP, approximately 16 650 individuals) gray whales primarily feed in the Arctic/sub-Arctic regions, while a small subgroup called the Pacific Coast Feeding Group (PCFG, approximately 212 individuals) instead feeds between northern California, USA and British Columbia, Canada. Evidence suggests PCFG whales have lower body condition than ENP whales. Here we investigate morphological differences (length, skull, and fluke span) and compare length-at-age growth curves between ENP and PCFG whales. We use whaling data from ENP whales (1959–1969) for comparison to data from PCFG whales collected through non-invasive techniques (2016–2022) to estimate age (photo-identification) and length (drone-based photogrammetry). We use Bayesian methods to incorporate uncertainty associated with morphological measurements (manual and photogrammetric) and age estimates. We find that while PCFG and ENP whales have similar growth rates, PCFG whales reach smaller asymptotic lengths. Additionally, PCFG whales have relatively smaller skulls and flukes than ENP whales. These findings represent a striking example of morphological adaptation that may facilitate PCFG whales accessing a foraging niche distinct from the Arctic foraging grounds of the broader ENP population.

History

Usage metrics

    Biology Letters

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC