pmed.1003858.s001.docx (39.77 kB)

S1 CONSORT Checklist -

journal contribution

posted on 2022-01-04, 18:22 authored by Jane S. Hocking, Anna Wood, Meredith Temple-Smith, Sabine Braat, Matthew Law, Liliana Bulfone, Callum Jones, Mieke van Driel, Christopher K. Fairley, Basil Donovan, Rebecca Guy, Nicola Low, John Kaldor, Jane Gunn

(DOCX)

History

Usage metrics

Categories

Keywords

study limitations included observational data suggest influence clinician behaviour adjusted absolute difference 31 december 2016 ci − 10 5 &# 8211 previous cluster rct ci − 5 least 1 consultation difference − 8 ci − 8 chlamydia testing rates annual chlamydia testing difference − 9 ci − 9 xlink "> audit removal versus retention able )5 %; 95 60 general practices removing financial incentives received financial incentives 8 %; 95 difference − 7 difference − 6 ci − 3 ci − 11 c versus groups annual testing decreased 5 – au 1 %; 95 group c ),4 %; 95 group b ),randomised controlled trial chlamydia testing rct ),1 %;group c financial incentives − 7 − 4 group b 7 %;testing across chlamydia test ), audit − 2 − 0 general practitioners general practice 60 clinics intervention group widely used unexpected reduction trial aimed treatment effect september 2015 quarterly audit primary outcome p =old patients july 2014 factorial analysis 7 %)4 groups 4 %)196 patients 12 months

Licence

Exports

RefWorks

BibTeX

Ref. manager

Endnote

DataCite

NLM

DC