Risk of bias and quality assessment for included studies.

Kamau, Stanley Githaiga; Akatusasira, Rita; Namatovu, Angella; Kibet, Emmanuel; Ssekitto, Joseph Mayanja; Mamun, Mohammed A.; Kaggwa, Mark Mohan

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0295227.s002

pone.0295227.s002.docx (12.32 kB)

Risk of bias and quality assessment for included studies.

journal contribution

posted on 2024-02-21, 18:31 authored by Stanley Githaiga Kamau, Rita Akatusasira, Angella Namatovu, Emmanuel Kibet, Joseph Mayanja Ssekitto, Mohammed A. Mamun, Mark Mohan Kaggwa

Risk of bias and quality assessment for included studies.

History

Usage metrics

Keywords

nevirapine plasma levels important social network 78 ∙ 0 4 – 87 1087 publications identified included articles published prospero registered review excluded qualitative studies google scholar double orphaned children single parent orphans improve adherence among hiv taking away highest prevalence provided 7 ∙ 6 shown poor adherence 2 included six studies art among children art adherence based analysis included studies poor adherence orphan children especially among art adherence systematic review six met double orphans >< sup various studies case studies scopus science pubmed p art ).xlink ">various methods various databases three μg selection criteria selected hiv prevalence study pooled prevalence pill count pill burden particular study parents leaves opinion papers ml ).june 01 following methods factors associated egger ’effect model data inception confidence interval clinical attendance caregiver ’caregiver involvement antiretroviral therapy adolescent orphans 92 %,

Licence

CC BY 4.0

Exports

RefWorks

BibTeX

Ref. manager

Endnote

DataCite

NLM

DC

Risk of bias and quality assessment for included studies.

History

Usage metrics

Categories

Keywords

Licence

Exports