figshare
Browse
Clark_et_al-2018-Journal_of_Geophysical_Research%3A_Space_Physics.pdf (2.21 MB)

Precipitating Electron Energy Flux and Characteristic Energies in Jupiter's Main Auroral Region as Measured by Juno/JEDI

Download (2.21 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2019-09-04, 14:26 authored by G Clark, C Tao, BH Mauk, J Nichols, J Saur, EJ Bunce, F Allegrini, R Gladstone, F Bagenal, S Bolton, B Bonfond, J Connerney, RW Ebert, DJ Gershman, D Haggerty, T Kimura, P Kollmann, S Kotsiaros, WS Kurth, S Levin, DJ McComas, G Murakami, C Paranicas, A Rymer, P Valek
The relationship between electron energy flux and the characteristic energy of electron distributions in the main auroral loss cone bridges the gap between predictions made by theory and measurements just recently available from Juno. For decades such relationships have been inferred from remote sensing observations of the Jovian aurora, primarily from the Hubble Space Telescope, and also more recently from Hisaki. However, to infer these quantities, remote sensing techniques had to assume properties of the Jovian atmospheric structure—leading to uncertainties in their profile. Juno's arrival and subsequent auroral passes have allowed us to obtain these relationships unambiguously for the first time, when the spacecraft passes through the auroral acceleration region. Using Juno/Jupiter Energetic particle Detector Instrument (JEDI), an energetic particle instrument, we present these relationships for the 30‐keV to 1‐MeV electron population. Observations presented here show that the electron energy flux in the loss cone is a nonlinear function of the characteristic or mean electron energy and supports both the predictions from Knight (1973, https://doi.org/10.1016/0032‐0633(73)90093‐7) and magnetohydrodynamic turbulence acceleration theories (e.g., Saur et al., 2003, https://doi.org/10.1029/2002GL015761). Finally, we compare the in situ analyses of Juno with remote Hisaki observations and use them to help constrain Jupiter's atmospheric profile. We find a possible solution that provides the best agreement between these data sets is an atmospheric profile that more efficiently transports the hydrocarbons to higher altitudes. If this is correct, it supports the previously published idea (e.g., Parkinson et al., 2006, https://doi.org/10.1029/2005JE002539) that precipitating electrons increase the hydrocarbon eddy diffusion coefficients in the auroral regions.

Funding

We would like to thank everyone that made the Juno and Hisaki mission a success as well as NASA and JAXA for establishing the Hisaki participating science program, which promotes collaboration and enhances the scientific return of Jupiter observations. G. C. would like to thank Denis Grodent, Vincent Hue, James Sinclair, Mark Perry, Don Mitchell, Brian Anderson, and Jesper Gjerloev for their helpful discussions and support. G. C. would also like to thank Chelsea Clark for copyediting. E. J. B. and J. D. N. are supported by STFC Consolidated grant ST/N000749/1, and E. J. B. is supported by a Royal Society Wolfson Research Merit Award.

History

Citation

Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 2018, 123 (9), pp. 7554-7567 (14)

Alternative title

Accepted manuscript online: 17 August 2018 Manuscript accepted: 04 August 2018

Author affiliation

/Organisation/COLLEGE OF SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING/Department of Physics and Astronomy

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics

Publisher

American Geophysical Union (AGU), Wiley

issn

2169-9380

eissn

2169-9402

Acceptance date

2018-08-04

Copyright date

2018

Available date

2019-09-04

Publisher version

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029/2018JA025639

Notes

At time of writing, Juno data for PJs 1–6 are in NASA's planetary data system, and the other data reside in an archive at the John Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory (http://www.jhuapl.edu/jedi). That site is password controlled, but access for evaluation can be obtained by contacting the lead author of this paper.

Language

en

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC