figshare
Browse

File(s) not publicly available

Physical activity, sedentary time and breast cancer risk: a Mendelian randomisation study

journal contribution
posted on 2023-02-10, 03:10 authored by Suzanne Dixon-SuenSuzanne Dixon-Suen, SJ Lewis, RM Martin, DR English, T Boyle, GG Giles, K Michailidou, MK Bolla, Q Wang, J Dennis, M Lush, A Investigators, TU Ahearn, CB Ambrosone, IL Andrulis, H Anton-Culver, V Arndt, KJ Aronson, A Augustinsson, P Auvinen, LEB Freeman, H Becher, MW Beckmann, S Behrens, M Bermisheva, C Blomqvist, NV Bogdanova, SE Bojesen, B Bonanni, H Brenner, T Brüning, SS Buys, NJ Camp, D Campa, F Canzian, JE Castelao, MH Cessna, J Chang-Claude, SJ Chanock, CL Clarke, DM Conroy, FJ Couch, A Cox, SS Cross, K Czene, MB Daly, P Devilee, T Dörk, M Dwek, DM Eccles, AH Eliassen, C Engel, M Eriksson, DG Evans, PA Fasching, O Fletcher, H Flyger, L Fritschi, M Gabrielson, M Gago-Dominguez, M García-Closas, JA García-Sáenz, MS Goldberg, P Guénel, M Gündert, E Hahnen, CA Haiman, L Häberle, N Håkansson, P Hall, U Hamann, SN Hart, M Harvie, P Hillemanns, A Hollestelle, MJ Hooning, R Hoppe, J Hopper, A Howell, DJ Hunter, A Jakubowska, W Janni, EM John, A Jung, R Kaaks, R Keeman, CM Kitahara, S Koutros, P Kraft, VN Kristensen, K Kubelka-Sabit, AW Kurian, JV Lacey, D Lambrechts, L Le Marchand, A Lindblom, S Loibl, J Lubiński, A Mannermaa, M Manoochehri
ObjectivesPhysical inactivity and sedentary behaviour are associated with higher breast cancer risk in observational studies, but ascribing causality is difficult. Mendelian randomisation (MR) assesses causality by simulating randomised trial groups using genotype. We assessed whether lifelong physical activity or sedentary time, assessed using genotype, may be causally associated with breast cancer risk overall, pre/post-menopause, and by case-groups defined by tumour characteristics.MethodsWe performed two-sample inverse-variance-weighted MR using individual-level Breast Cancer Association Consortium case-control data from 130 957 European-ancestry women (69 838 invasive cases), and published UK Biobank data (n=91 105–377 234). Genetic instruments were single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated in UK Biobank with wrist-worn accelerometer-measured overall physical activity (nsnps=5) or sedentary time (nsnps=6), or accelerometer-measured (nsnps=1) or self-reported (nsnps=5) vigorous physical activity.ResultsGreater genetically-predicted overall activity was associated with lower breast cancer overall risk (OR=0.59; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42 to 0.83 per-standard deviation (SD;~8 milligravities acceleration)) and for most case-groups. Genetically-predicted vigorous activity was associated with lower risk of pre/perimenopausal breast cancer (OR=0.62; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.87,≥3 vs. 0 self-reported days/week), with consistent estimates for most case-groups. Greater genetically-predicted sedentary time was associated with higher hormone-receptor-negative tumour risk (OR=1.77; 95% CI 1.07 to 2.92 per-SD (~7% time spent sedentary)), with elevated estimates for most case-groups. Results were robust to sensitivity analyses examining pleiotropy (including weighted-median-MR, MR-Egger).ConclusionOur study provides strong evidence that greater overall physical activity, greater vigorous activity, and lower sedentary time are likely to reduce breast cancer risk. More widespread adoption of active lifestyles may reduce the burden from the most common cancer in women.

History

Journal

British Journal of Sports Medicine

Volume

56

Pagination

1157-1170

Location

England

ISSN

0306-3674

eISSN

1473-0480

Language

English

Publication classification

C1.1 Refereed article in a scholarly journal

Issue

20

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP

Usage metrics

    Research Publications

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC