figshare
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Reason: Permanent publisher embargo

Once-Weekly Insulin Icodec With Dosing Guide App Versus Once-Daily Basal Insulin Analogues in Insulin-Naive Type 2 Diabetes (ONWARDS 5) : A Randomized Trial.

journal contribution
posted on 2023-11-14, 09:32 authored by Harpreet S Bajaj, Jens Aberle, Melanie Davies, Anders Meller Donatsky, Marie Frederiksen, Dilek G Yavuz, Amoolya Gowda, Ildiko Lingvay, Bruce Bode

Background

Inadequate dose titration and poor adherence to basal insulin can lead to suboptimal glycemic control in persons with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Once-weekly insulin icodec (icodec) is a basal insulin analogue that is in development and is aimed at reducing treatment burden.

Objective

To compare the effectiveness and safety of icodec titrated with a dosing guide app (icodec with app) versus once-daily basal insulin analogues (OD analogues) dosed per standard practice.

Design

52-week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, phase 3a trial with real-world elements. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04760626).

Setting

176 sites in 7 countries.

Participants

1085 insulin-naive adults with T2D.

Intervention

Icodec with app or OD analogue (insulin degludec, insulin glargine U100, or insulin glargine U300).

Measurements

The primary outcome was change in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level from baseline to week 52. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported outcomes (Treatment Related Impact Measure for Diabetes [TRIM-D] compliance domain score and change in Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire [DTSQ] total treatment satisfaction score).

Results

The estimated mean change in HbA1c level from baseline to week 52 was greater with icodec with app than with OD analogues, with noninferiority (P < 0.001) and superiority (P = 0.009) confirmed in prespecified hierarchical testing (estimated treatment difference [ETD], -0.38 percentage points [95% CI, -0.66 to -0.09 percentage points]). At week 52, patient-reported outcomes were more favorable with icodec with app than with OD analogues (ETDs, 3.04 [CI, 1.28 to 4.81] for TRIM-D and 0.78 [CI, 0.10 to 1.47] for DTSQ). Rates of clinically significant or severe hypoglycemia were low and similar with both treatments.

Limitation

Inability to differentiate the effects of icodec and the dosing guide app.

Conclusion

Compared with OD analogues, icodec with app showed superior HbA1c reduction and improved treatment satisfaction and compliance with similarly low hypoglycemia rates.

Primary funding source

Novo Nordisk A/S.

Funding

Novo Nordisk A/S

History

Author affiliation

Diabetes Research Centre, University of Leicester

Version

  • AM (Accepted Manuscript)

Published in

Annals of internal medicine

Publisher

American College of Physicians

issn

0003-4819

eissn

1539-3704

Copyright date

2023

Spatial coverage

United States

Language

eng

Usage metrics

    University of Leicester Publications

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC