How Axial Coordination Regulates the Electronic Structure and C–H Amination Reactivity of Fe–Porphyrin–Nitrene?

Detailed electronic structure and its correlation with the intramolecular C–H amination reactivity of Fe–porphyrin–nitrene intermediates bearing different “axial” coordination have been investigated using multiconfigurational complete active space self-consistent field (CASSCF), N-electron valence perturbation theory (NEVPT2), and hybrid density functional theory (DFT-B3LYP) calculations. Three types of “axial” coordination, −OMe/–O(H)Me (1-Sul/2-Sul), −SMe/–S(H)Me (3-Sul/4-Sul), and −NMeIm (MeIm = 3-methyl-imidazole) (5-Sul) mimicking serine, cysteine, and histidine, respectively, along with no axial coordination (6-Sul) have been considered to decipher how the “axial” coordination of different strengths regulates the electronic integrity of the Fe–N core and nitrene-transfer reactivity of Fe–porphyrin–nitrene intermediates. CASSCF-based natural orbitals reveal two distinct classes of electronic structures: Fe-nitrenes (1-Sul and 3-Sul) with relatively stronger axial coordination (−OMe and −SMe) display “imidyl” nature and those (2-Sul, 4-Sul, and 6-Sul) with weaker axial coordination (−O(H)Me, −S(H)Me and no axial coordination) exhibit “imido-like” character. A borderline between the two classes is also observed with NMeIm axial coordination (5-Sul). Axial coordination of different strengths not only regulates the electronic structure but also modulates the Fe-3d orbital energies, as revealed through the d–d transition energies obtained by CASSCF/NEVPT2 calculations. The relatively lower energy of Fe-3d_z2 orbital allows easy access to low-lying high-spin quintet states in the cases of weaker “axial” coordination (2-Sul, 4-Sul, and 6-Sul), and the associated hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) reactivity appears to involve two-state triplet-quintet reactivity through minimum energy crossing point (^3,5MECP) between the spin states. In stark contrast, Fe-nitrenes with relatively stronger “axial” coordination (1-Sul and 3-Sul) undergo triplet-only HAT reactivity. Overall, this in-depth electronic structure investigation and HAT reactivity evaluation reveal that the weaker axial coordination in Fe–porphyrin–nitrene complexes (2-Sul, 4-Sul, and 6-Sul) can promote more efficient C–H oxidation through the quintet spin state.