figshare
Browse
icmt_a_1915271_sm2672.docx (36.74 kB)

Fracture recurrence in hip fracture with menopausal hormone therapy versus risedronate: a clinical trial

Download (36.74 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2021-07-09, 11:20 authored by C.-W. Park, S.-J. Lim, Y.-W. Moon, S.-H. Choi, M.-H. Shin, Y.-K. Min, B.-K. Yoon, Y.-S. Park

An open-label, randomized trial was conducted to examine the effects of risedronate versus menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) in postmenopausal women with recent hip fracture.

Among 1165 eligible women, 281 were recruited and randomly assigned to receive oral risedronate (35 mg/week) or percutaneous estradiol gel (1.5 mg/day) plus oral micronized progesterone (100 mg/day) for 4 years. The primary end point was recurrent fracture and the secondary end points were mortality and bone mineral density (BMD).

Kaplan–Meier analyses showed no significant differences in fracture recurrence and mortality between the two groups. The incidence of any new fracture per 100 person-years (PY) was 8.63 in the risedronate group and 12.86 in the MHT group (p = 0.180); that of clinical fracture was 4.75 and 6.99, respectively (p = 0.265); and that of asymptomatic vertebral fracture was 4.87 and 5.58, respectively (p = 0.764). The respective incidence of death per 100 PY was 3.58 and 4.40 (p = 0.503). BMD increased comparably at the lumbar spine in both groups. BMD at the total hip did not change in the risedronate group, but increased significantly by 2.8% in the MHT group.

MHT might not differ from risedronate in the prevention of secondary fractures and death among postmenopausal women with recent hip fracture.

Funding

This work was supported, in part, by Samsung Medical Center Research Fund [PHO1133361] and IN-SUNG Foundation for Medical Research [C-A5-811-1].

History