figshare
Browse
Baltas 2023.pdf (815.05 kB)

Exploring the views of infection consultants in England on a novel delinked funding model for antimicrobials: the SMASH study

Download (815.05 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-08-11, 10:16 authored by Ioannis Baltas, Mark Gilchrist, Eirini Koutoumanou, Malick M Gibani, James E Meiring, Akaninyene Otu, David Hettle, Ameeka Thompson, James Price, Anna Crepet, Abolaji Atomode, Timothy Crocker-Buque, Dimitrios Spinos, Hudson Guyver, Matija Tausan, Donald Somasunderam, Maxwell Thoburn, Cathleen Chan, Helen Umpleby, Bethany Sharp, Callum Chivers, Devan Suresh Vaghela, Ronak J Shah, Jonathan Foster, Amy Hume, Christopher Smith, Ammara Asif, Dimitrios Mermerelis, Mohammad Abbas Reza, Dominic A Haigh, Thomas Lamb, Loucia Karatzia, Alexandra Bramley, Nikhil Kadam, Konstantinos Kavallieros, Veronica Garcia-Arias, Jane Democratis, Claire S Waddington, Luke SP Moore, Alexander M Aiken

Objectives

A novel ‘subscription-type’ funding model was launched in England in July 2022 for ceftazidime/avibactam and cefiderocol. We explored the views of infection consultants on important aspects of the delinked antimicrobial funding model.

Methods

An online survey was sent to all infection consultants in NHS acute hospitals in England.

Results

The response rate was 31.2% (235/753). Most consultants agreed the model is a welcome development (69.8%, 164/235), will improve treatment of drug-resistant infections (68.5%, 161/235) and will stimulate research and development of new antimicrobials (57.9%, 136/235). Consultants disagreed that the model would lead to reduced carbapenem use and reported increased use of cefiderocol post-implementation. The presence of an antimicrobial pharmacy team, requirement for preauthorization by infection specialists, antimicrobial stewardship ward rounds and education of infection specialists were considered the most effective antimicrobial stewardship interventions. Under the new model, 42.1% (99/235) of consultants would use these antimicrobials empirically, if risk factors for antimicrobial resistance were present (previous infection, colonization, treatment failure with carbapenems, ward outbreak, recent admission to a high-prevalence setting).

Significantly higher insurance and diversity values were given to model antimicrobials compared with established treatments for carbapenem-resistant infections, while meropenem recorded the highest enablement value. Use of both ‘subscription-type’ model drugs for a wide range of infection sites was reported. Respondents prioritized ceftazidime/avibactam for infections by bacteria producing OXA-48 and KPC and cefiderocol for those producing MBLs and infections with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Acinetobacter spp. and Burkholderia cepacia.

Conclusions

The ‘subscription-type’ model was viewed favourably by infection consultants in England.

History

Publication status

  • Published

File Version

  • Published version

Journal

JAC Antimicrob Resist

ISSN

2632-1823

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Issue

4

Volume

5

Article number

dlad091

Department affiliated with

  • BSMS Publications
  • Global Health and Infection Publications

Full text available

  • Yes

Peer reviewed?

  • Yes

Usage metrics

    University of Sussex (Publications)

    Categories

    No categories selected

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC