figshare
Browse
European J of Heart Fail - 2022 - Whinnett - Effects of haemodynamically atrio‐ventricular optimized His bundle pacing on.pdf (885.11 kB)

Effects of haemodynamically atrio-ventricular optimized His bundle pacing on heart failure symptoms and exercise capacity: the His Optimized Pacing Evaluated for Heart Failure (HOPE-HF) randomized, double-blind, cross-over trial

Download (885.11 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-03-01, 17:18 authored by ZI Whinnett, MJ Shun-Shin, M Tanner, P Foley, B Chandrasekaran, P Moore, S Adhya, N Qureshi, A Muthumala, R Lane, A Rinaldi, S Agarwal, F Leyva, J Behar, S Bassi, A Ng, P Scott, R Prasad, J Swinburn, J Tomson, A Sethi, J Shah, PB Lim, A Kyriacou, D Thomas, J Chuen, R Kamdar, P Kanagaratnam, M Mariveles, L Burden, K March, JP Howard, A Arnold, P Vijayaraman, B Stegemann, N Johnson, E Falaschetti, DP Francis, JGF Cleland, D Keene
Aims: Excessive prolongation of PR interval impairs coupling of atrio-ventricular (AV) contraction, which reduces left ventricular pre-load and stroke volume, and worsens symptoms. His bundle pacing allows AV delay shortening while maintaining normal ventricular activation. HOPE-HF evaluated whether AV optimized His pacing is preferable to no-pacing, in a double-blind cross-over fashion, in patients with heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40%, PR interval ≥200 ms and either QRS ≤140 ms or right bundle branch block. Methods and results: Patients had atrial and His bundle leads implanted (and an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator lead if clinically indicated) and were randomized to 6 months of pacing and 6 months of no-pacing utilizing a cross-over design. The primary outcome was peak oxygen uptake during symptom-limited exercise. Quality of life, LVEF and patients' holistic symptomatic preference between arms were secondary outcomes. Overall, 167 patients were randomized: 90% men, 69 ± 10 years, QRS duration 124 ± 26 ms, PR interval 249 ± 59 ms, LVEF 33 ± 9%. Neither peak oxygen uptake (+0.25 ml/kg/min, 95% confidence interval [CI] −0.23 to +0.73, p = 0.3) nor LVEF (+0.5%, 95% CI −0.7 to 1.6, p = 0.4) changed with pacing but Minnesota Living with Heart Failure quality of life improved significantly (−3.7, 95% CI −7.1 to −0.3, p = 0.03). Seventy-six percent of patients preferred His bundle pacing-on and 24% pacing-off (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: His bundle pacing did not increase peak oxygen uptake but, under double-blind conditions, significantly improved quality of life and was symptomatically preferred by the clear majority of patients. Ventricular pacing delivered via the His bundle did not adversely impact ventricular function during the 6 months.

Funding

AV optimisation delivered with direct His bundle pacing, in patients with heart failure, long PR without left bundle branch block: randomised multi-centre clinical outcome study 'The His Optimised Pacing Evaluated for Heart Failure Trial (HOPE-HF)'

British Heart Foundation

Find out more...

History

Author affiliation

College of Life Sciences/Cardiovascular Sciences

Version

  • VoR (Version of Record)

Published in

European Journal of Heart Failure

Volume

25

Issue

2

Pagination

274 - 283

Publisher

Wiley

issn

1388-9842

eissn

1879-0844

Copyright date

2022

Available date

2024-03-01

Spatial coverage

England

Language

eng

Deposited by

Professor G. André Ng

Deposit date

2024-02-15