pmed.1003752.s006.docx (382.75 kB)
Economic evaluation.
journal contribution
posted on 2021-09-09, 17:36 authored by Peter MacPherson, Emily L. Webb, Wala Kamchedzera, Elizabeth Joekes, Gugu Mjoli, David G. Lalloo, Titus H. Divala, Augustine T. Choko, Rachael M. Burke, Hendramoorthy Maheswaran, Madhukar Pai, S. Bertel Squire, Marriott Nliwasa, Elizabeth L. Corbett(DOCX)
History
Usage metrics
Categories
Keywords
high global burdenhigh cad4tbv5 scores497 randomly allocated27 november 2019efficiently improve tbprospect study ):adjusted life yearxlink "> dcxrtb screening armsshort participant follow15 november 2018tb screening armhiv screening reducedtb versus sochiv screening armtb screening participantstb screening ).rr ]: 0care plus dcxr11 %), 52arm randomised trial38 ), 60 %) socday tb treatment5 %) participants0 %) hiv5 %) hiveffectiveness analysis used1 %) soctb screeningsoc armhiv screeningtb treatment5 %)day treatment0 %),tb diagnosisstudy staffrandomised triallife benefitsday 5671 ).03 ).0 %.2 %)untreated hivsystematic hivhiv testinghiv diagnosishiv contribute87 ),22 ),9 %)ray screening2 soc7 %)treat basissputum xpertrisk ratioprovider perspectiveprimary outcomemain limitationsinvestigator blindinginvestigated costsintervention allocationincremental costshazard ratiofinal analysisaided x9 %),2 hiv
Licence
Exports
RefWorksRefWorks
BibTeXBibTeX
Ref. managerRef. manager
EndnoteEndnote
DataCiteDataCite
NLMNLM
DCDC