ETONG ARMAND BRICE, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND NATIVES OF SABAH AND SARAWAK.pdf (685.37 kB)
ETONG ARMAND BRICE, CONSTITUTIONAL LAW AND NATIVES OF SABAH AND SARAWAK.pdf
Sovereign governments and states do have obligations, rights and responsibilities1
under
international and national or municipal laws to protect and promote human rights, principles of
equality, non-discrimination, fair and equal treatment before the law regardless of your race, belief,
political status, including ethnic, and cultural as well as linguistic minority groups. Under Article
160A (6) of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia the term “native” means— 135 (a) in relation to
Sarawak, a person who is a citizen and either belongs to one of the races specified in Clause (7) as
indigenous to the State or is of mixed blood deriving exclusively from those races; and (b) in relation
to Sabah, a person who is a citizen, is the child or grandchild of a person of a race indigenous to
Sabah, and was born (whether on or after Malaysia Day or not) either in Sabah or to a father domiciled
in Sabah at the time of the birth and under Article 160, the concept “Malay” means a person who
professes the religion of Islam, habitually speaks the Malay language, conforms to Malay custom
and—(a) was before Merdeka Day born in the Federation or in Singapore or born of parents one of
whom was born in the Federation or in Singapore, or is on that day domiciled in the Federation or in
Singapore; or (b) is the issue of such a person. Moreover, under Article160 (2) the term “Aborigine”
means an aborigine of the Malay Peninsula” so, the ethnic label Orang Asli2 meaning “natural people”
in Malay replaced the term “ aborigines” used by the British Colonial Administration. Orang Asli
refers to the native peoples3
of peninsular Malaysia who are not Malay Muslims, Malaysia’s main
ethnic group and conventionally are divided into eighteen ethno-linguistic subgroups4
. They appear to
be the most vulnerable and disempowered groups of people since they have been either socially and
politically excluded or marginalized historically5
speaking and as a result of that they do need a
significant protection and contribution and support from the Government with regard to the
recognition, protection and management of their native customary lands6
or rights as well as
proprietary interests. Firstly, this paper will critically explore through a qualitative analysis some
constitutional rights7
of aboriginal people of Malaysia as basis of their claims, rights and duties.
Secondly, it will examine how some judicial decisions or case laws played a key role in shaping and
changing the way native customary rights are perceived and understood today with respect to the right
to land, property etc. Finally, it will highlight some challenges faced by the Orang Asli despite some
improvements.