figshare
Browse
1455031_Contos,P_2024.pdf (2.1 MB)

DNA metabarcoding uncovers dispersal-constrained arthropods in a highly fragmented restoration setting

Download (2.1 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-03-18, 00:01 authored by Peter ContosPeter Contos, Heloise GibbHeloise Gibb, S Jellinek, Nicholas MurphyNicholas Murphy
Degraded areas are often restored through active revegetation; however, recolonization by animals is rarely engineered. Recolonization may be rapid for species with strong dispersal abilities. However, poor dispersers, such as many flightless arthropods, may struggle to recolonize newly restored sites. Actively reintroducing or “rewilding” arthropods may therefore be necessary to facilitate recolonization and restoration of arthropod communities and the ecological functions they perform. However, active interventions are rare. The purpose of this study was twofold. First, we asked whether potential source remnant arthropod communities were dispersal-constrained and struggling to recolonize restoration sites. Second, we tested whether reintroducing entire arthropod communities from remnant populations would help dispersal-constrained species establish during farmland ecological restoration in southern Australia. Rewilding was conducted in summer 2018 by transplanting leaf litter, soil, and entire communities contained within it from remnant source populations into geographically isolated restoration sites, which were paired with untreated controls (n = 6 remnant, rewilding transplant, and control sites). We collected leaf litter and extracted arthropod communities 19 months after the initial rewilding event, then sequenced mite, springtail, and insect communities using a metabarcoding approach. Within all groups, community similarity decreased with spatial distance between sites, suggesting significant dispersal barriers. However, only mite communities showed a strong response to rewilding, which was expressed as increased compositional similarity toward remnant sites and greater species richness relative to controls. Our results demonstrate that many arthropod species may struggle to recolonize geographically isolated restoration sites and that full community restoration requires active interventions via rewilding.

Funding

Funding was provided by the Hermon Slade Foundation (HSF19037), Holsworth Student Wildlife Award, and the Oatley Flora and Fauna Society.

History

Publication Date

2024-03-01

Journal

Restoration Ecology

Volume

32

Issue

3

Article Number

e14068

Pagination

12p.

Publisher

Wiley

ISSN

1061-2971

Rights Statement

© 2023 The Authors. Restoration Ecology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Society for Ecological Restoration. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.