pone.0269211.s002.docx (14.11 kB)
Comparison with other studies.
journal contribution
posted on 2024-01-19, 18:52 authored by Daniel Tchemerinsky Konieczny, Alexander Wieck Fjaeldstad, Kristian SandbergList of results in other studies [9, 20, 21]. Note that these studies differ either in how the IOQ was scored (IOQ18 using only the total App, Ass and Con while leaving out Agg) or in terms of the culture of the studies population (Asian or American rather than European).
(DOCX)
History
Usage metrics
Categories
Keywords
valuable clinical measuresubjective olfactory experienceproduced promising resultspreviously published resultspotential olfactory lossonline versus pencould therefore serveclinicians &# 8217taken using penq performed satisfactorilyenglish proficiency tookdenmark taken digitallyxlink ">slightly lowersignificant effectsampled populationretest reliabilitynearly identicalintroduced aroundinternal consistencyinitial validationsindicating littlehigh levelensure qualitydecade agocrucial part179 younger
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC