pone.0298387.s003.docx (58.08 kB)
Assessment of risk of bias of included studies using Hoy et al 2012.
journal contribution
posted on 2024-03-13, 17:38 authored by Basant Elsayed, Mohamed Elmarasi, Ruvarashe J. Madzime, Lovemore Mapahla, Menatalla M. S. ElBadway, Tawanda ChiveseThis table shows the assessment of risk of bias of the included studies using 11 item Hoy et al tool.
(DOCX)
History
Usage metrics
Keywords
progress towards meetingpriority countries need7 &# 82112016 &# 82112010 &# 82110 &# 8211variance heterogeneity modelssynthesized using inversebiggest health challengesubstantially lower prevalence9 &# 82113 &# 82116 %, 955 &# 82112023 &# 82129 %, 953 %, 95current mc prevalencexlink "> overalleastern african countriesmale circumcision prevalenceanalysis 2 higher mc prevalencexlink ">male circumcisionheterogeneity usingoverall prevalence50 %,mc prevalencesouthern africanhealth surveyhigher prevalencemc coveragesystematic reviewstudy periodstudies publishedsouthern africasearched pubmedsaharan africarural settingsprevent hivkey partgoogle scholarcochrane centralci 49ci 32ci 31ci 27ci 25ci 2153 studies5 ).2 ).
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC