Additional file 1 of A meta-review demonstrates improved reporting quality of qualitative reviews following the publication of COREQ- and ENTREQ-checklists, regardless of modest uptake

de Jong, Y.; van der Willik, E. M.; Milders, J.; Voorend, C. G. N.; Morton, Rachael L.; Dekker, F. W.; Meuleman, Y.; van Diepen, M.

doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.16609012.v1

12874_2021_1363_MOESM1_ESM.docx (652.94 kB)

Additional file 1 of A meta-review demonstrates improved reporting quality of qualitative reviews following the publication of COREQ- and ENTREQ-checklists, regardless of modest uptake

journal contribution

posted on 2021-09-13, 03:11 authored by Y. de Jong, E. M. van der Willik, J. Milders, C. G. N. Voorend, Rachael L. Morton, F. W. Dekker, Y. Meuleman, M. van Diepen

Additional file 1.

History

Usage metrics

Keywords

Methodology Appraisal Qualitative research Meta-review Systematic review COREQ ENTREQ Impact study Uptake

Licence

CC BY + CC0

Exports

RefWorks

BibTeX

Ref. manager

Endnote

DataCite

NLM

DC

Additional file 1 of A meta-review demonstrates improved reporting quality of qualitative reviews following the publication of COREQ- and ENTREQ-checklists, regardless of modest uptake

History

Usage metrics

Categories

Keywords

Licence

Exports