pone.0278020.s001.docx (15.33 kB)
Access rates to different accelerator combinations (% of overall population) in the study sample.
journal contribution
posted on 2023-01-06, 18:36 authored by Lorraine Sherr, Katharina Haag, Mark Tomlinson, William E. Rudgard, Sarah Skeen, Franziska Meinck, Stefani M. Du Toit, Kathryn J. Steventon Roberts, Sarah L. Gordon, Chris Desmond, Lucie CluverThis table captures which accelerators an individual had access to. E.g., if a person is grouped under “CBO+FS”, this means they did not have access to CM, SC, and CP.
(DOCX)
History
Usage metrics
Keywords
provides implementation guidanceadolescents &# 8212predicted probability differencesderive policy guidancedetermine optimal combinationsyoung carers (<various protective factorsdiv >< pvarious accelerator combinationsthough different combinationsgenerate five acceleratorsinvestigate multiplicative effectscurrent data showprotective factorsfive acceleratorsresults showpredicted probabilitiespolicy makersadditive effectsaccelerator conceptmany combinationsdifferent outcomesunderstanding acceleratorsthree acceleratorsadditional acceleratorsaccelerators workyear followtwo databasessynergistic interactionssouth africashown supportsdg outcomerelative gainsrelative gainrecent evidenceprogrammatic areasn marked improvementsimprove sdghigh qualityfuture workfood securitydetailed knowledgedetailed impactcaregiver praisecaregiver monitoringbaseline (<based organizationsadditional costs14 sdg
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC