figshare
Browse
Jessop et al 2024 Rov vs diver Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science.pdf (2.66 MB)

A comparison of the behavioural responses of fishes to a remotely operated vehicle and diver-based stereo-video sampling

Download (2.66 MB)
journal contribution
posted on 2024-01-29, 00:27 authored by Sarah A Jessop, Benjamin J Saunders, Jordan S Goetze, Neville BarrettNeville Barrett, Euan S Harvey
Successful monitoring of fishes to inform adaptive management relies on accurate and robust data on a range of indicators including diversity, abundance, and length-based metrics. The methods for gathering this data have evolved from destructive techniques to underwater visual census (UVC), and now emergent methods such as divers or remote operated vehicles (ROVs) equipped with stereo-video systems. Stereo-video techniques can provide accurate information on traditional metrics such as abundance, length, and biomass, as well as metrics on fish behaviour. Fish wariness, measured by the minimum distance between fish and an observer or stereo-video system before the fish moves away (minimum approach distance; MAD) is an emerging metric for assessing changes in fishing pressure which can be more sensitive than traditional metrics. Differences in fish behaviour across methods can bias results and influence measurement accuracy and precision of stereo-video systems, because accuracy decreases as the distance of fish increases away from the cameras. We assessed the behaviour of six focal species towards a diver using a stereo-video system (stereo-DOV) and a stereo-video system mounted on a remotely operated vehicle (stereo-ROV). We also compared the fish lengths and the length frequency distribution of measurements from the two methods. We aimed to increase the understanding of the relative abilities of the two methods at gathering length-based data and the differences in fish behavioural responses towards the methods. There were no differences in the proportion of length measurements or the mean length, and small differences in the length frequency distribution sampled by the two methods. We found that MAD differed between the methods and the direction of this difference was species-specific. This was likely due to different trophic traits such as foraging modes and behavioural patterns between these species and potentially adaptations resulting from fishing pressure. Indicator species such as Pomacentridae species showed more aggressive behaviour towards SCUBA divers, likely due to defence of their territories, while fisheries targeted species such as Choerodon rubescens showed more wariness towards divers as a possible adaptation to fishing pressure. At the assemblage level, the relationship between MAD and fish length was weaker with the stereo-ROV, indicating that larger fish showed more wariness towards SCUBA divers than the ROV. The decreased wariness of larger fish and fisheries targeted species towards the stereo-ROV compared to stereo-DOV, as well as the similarities in the length frequency distributions sampled by the two methods suggest that stereo-ROV may provide a suitable alternative to stereo-DOV.

Funding

Comparison on long-term diver-based monitoring methods with new remote-sensing approaches in Western Australia : Western Australian Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attraction

History

Publication title

Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science

Volume

298

Article number

108621

Pagination

10

ISSN

0272-7714

Department/School

Ecology and Biodiversity

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD

Publication status

  • Published

Rights statement

Copyright 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access articel under the CC BY-NC license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

UN Sustainable Development Goals

14 Life Below Water

Usage metrics

    Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC