figshareBrowse
Figure_5.tif (814.24 kB)
Download file

Comparison of viral clearance rates for CLVL versus CLQIFT and for treated versus untreated patients.

Download (0 kB)
figure
posted on 2014-03-21, 02:50 authored by Xi Chen, Kaveh Pouran Yousef, Susanne Duwe, Katharina Karsch, Sandeep Grover, Stephanie Wählisch, Patrick Obermeier, Franziska Tief, Susann Mühlhans, Lea Seeber, Max von Kleist, Brunhilde Schweiger, Barbara Rath

Variance in viral clearance rates for quantitative is smaller in treated than in untreated patients, for both VL and QIFT.

History

Usage metrics

Read the peer-reviewed publication

Quantitative Influenza Follow-Up Testing (QIFT)—A Novel Biomarker for the Monitoring of Disease Activity at the Point-of-Care
PLOS ONEPLOS ONE

Categories

Keywords

BiochemistrybiomarkersComputational biologyPopulation modelingInfectious disease modelingmicrobiologyMicrobial controlantimicrobialsantiviralsVirologyViral replicationViral nucleic acidViral transmission and infectionViral clearanceDiagnostic medicineInfectious diseasesViral diseasesinfluenzaInfectious disease controlpediatricsChild healthPediatric pulmonologyPublic and occupational healthresearch designClinical research designLongitudinal studiesviralclearanceratestreateduntreated

Licence

CC BY 4.0

Exports