figshare
Browse
pbio.3002512.g005.tif (872.57 kB)

Theta gamma PAC is consistent across trials and participants.

Download (872.57 kB)
figure
posted on 2024-03-05, 18:29 authored by Arthur Borderie, Anne Caclin, Jean-Philippe Lachaux, Marcela Perrone-Bertollotti, Roxane S. Hoyer, Philippe Kahane, Hélène Catenoix, Barbara Tillmann, Philippe Albouy

(A) SEEG contacts identified in Fig 4A and grouped as a function of their location according to the AAL Atlas: green, left STS; red, left hippocampus; blue, right ITG; yellow, left IFG/insula. Regions are displayed on the single subject T1 in the MNI space provided by SPM12. Source data can be found at https://osf.io/m7dta/. (B) PAC intertrial phase consistency computed for each region. Bar plot shows intertrial phase locking values across participants and SEEG contacts for memory trials (correct responses, colored as a function of the regions) and perception trials in the same region. Error bars indicate SEM. Asterisk indicates significance. Source data can be found at https://osf.io/m7dta/. (C) Preferred coupling phase: gamma power presented as a function of theta phase bins for each region. Shading represents the standard deviation across trials and participants. Asterisks (*** p < .001; * p < .05) and grey shading indicate significance. Note that for clarity, we show only the results for the post hoc tests performed for the peak of gamma power for each region. Detailed post hoc statistics are reported in S7S10 Tables. Source data can be found at https://osf.io/m7dta/. IFG, inferior frontal gyrus; ITG, inferior temporal gyrus; PAC, phase amplitude coupling; STS, superior temporal sulcus.

History