Sequence of hang pull.

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of rest redistribution (RR) on kinetics and kinematics during the hang pull (HP). Twenty-one male athletes (age 29.5 ± 4.3 years, height 1.78 ± 0.07 m, body mass 75.17 ± 11.11 kg, relative one repetition maximum [1RM] power clean [PC] 1.17 ± 0.14 kg.kg^-1) performed the HP using 140% of 1RM PC with 3 traditional sets of 6 repetitions (TS), 9 sets of 2 repetitions with RR [45s rest after 2 repetitions] (RR₄₅) and 6 sets of 3 repetitions with RR [72s rest after 3 repetitions] (RR₇₂). Peak velocity (PV) was higher during RR₇₂ (1.18 ± 0.11 m.s^-1) compared to RR₄₅ (1.14 ± 0.11 m.s^-1) for the average of 18 repetitions (p = 0.025, g = 0.36). There was a main effect for set configuration with greater peak force (PF) (p < 0.001, g = 0.14) during RR₇₂ compared to RR_45, with greater PV and impulse (p < 0.001, g = 0.19–0.36) during RR₇₂ compared to RR₄₅. There was also greater peak velocity maintenance (PVM) (p = 0.042, g = 0.44) for RR₇₂ compared to RR_45. There were no significant or meaningful differences (p > 0.05, g = 0.00–0.59) between configurations for any other variables. Rest redistribution protocols did not result in significantly or meaningfully greater kinetics or kinematics during the HP when compared to a TS protocol; although performing RR₇₂ resulted in higher PF, PV, and impulse, with improved PVM compared to RR_45.