figshare
Browse
pone.0257697.g002.tif (308.49 kB)

Meta-analysis of carotid web in ischemic stroke cohorts.

Download (308.49 kB)
figure
posted on 2021-09-17, 17:30 authored by Brian Mac Grory, Erez Nossek, Michael E. Reznik, Matthew Schrag, Mahesh Jayaraman, Ryan McTaggart, Adam de Havenon, Shadi Yaghi, Wuwei Feng, Karen Furie, Anusha Boyanpally

Panel A: Relative risk of ipsilateral versus contralateral carotid web in patients with stroke All studies. (I2 = 27.71%, p = 0.0009). Panel B: Cryptogenic stroke only. (I2 = 0%, p = 0.0001). Panel C: Cryptogenic stroke in patients less than 60 years old. (I2 = 0%, p = 0.001). Panel D: Pooled prevalence of ipsilateral carotid web in young (<60) patients with cryptogenic stroke combined via a random effects model. (I2 = 65.42%). Please note that “Mac Grory 2021” refers to the present study.

History

Usage metrics

    PLOS ONE

    Categories

    Keywords

    future studies concerningcomputed tomography angiographycompelling potential mechanismembolic ischemic strokecomprehensive stroke centeracute ischemic strokecarotid artery websipsilateral carotid web879 met criteria60 years old6 – 545 %) patientsischemic stroke patients5 – 45 %) patientscryptogenic stroke patientsanalysis 2 6 %)cryptogenic strokecarotid webstroke subtypesstroke associatedcarotid bifurcationyoung patientspatients less244 patients192 patientsxlink ">thin shelfsystematic reviewsimilar cohortsseptember 2017secondary preventionrelative riskjune 2012

    Licence

    CC BY 4.0

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC