pone.0294509.g003.tif (2.54 MB)
Mean (◾) effect size (95%CI), overall composite effect size (—), 95%CI of overall composite effect size (- ·—· -) for magnitude of difference between predicted 1RM by two-point method and 1RM value by direct method.
figure
posted on 2023-11-20, 18:26 authored by Zongwei Chen, Zheng Gong, Liwen Pan, Xiuli ZhangA: upper-limb exercise; B: lower-limb exercise. It should be noted that the smaller the ES, the more accurate the two-point method predicts 1RM.
History
Usage metrics
Categories
Keywords
predicting 1rm usingpredicting 1rm comparedvelocity measurement devicesystematic review aimed1rm determination methoddiv >< ppoint method needspotential influence factorspoint methodpredict 1rmreliable methoddirect methodvelocity variablevelocity feedbackreview indicatedfull reviewthree studiessportdiscus databasesresistance trainingp outcome measuresoffer directionslarge differencefuture researchfactors influencingeffect sizecomprehensive searchchosen reasonably275 ];001 );
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC