figshare
Browse
DOCUMENT
S01.pdf (647.52 kB)
DOCUMENT
S02.pdf (532.46 kB)
DOCUMENT
S03.pdf (584.33 kB)
DOCUMENT
S04.pdf (592.69 kB)
DOCUMENT
S05.pdf (641.12 kB)
DOCUMENT
S06.pdf (583.47 kB)
DOCUMENT
S07.pdf (668.54 kB)
DOCUMENT
S08.pdf (604.78 kB)
DOCUMENT
S10.pdf (561.97 kB)
DOCUMENT
S11.pdf (581.73 kB)
DOCUMENT
S12.pdf (517.65 kB)
DOCUMENT
S13.pdf (594.34 kB)
DOCUMENT
S14.pdf (714.95 kB)
DOCUMENT
S15.pdf (587.83 kB)
DOCUMENT
S16.pdf (610.9 kB)
DOCUMENT
S17.pdf (646.76 kB)
DOCUMENT
S18.pdf (658.2 kB)
DOCUMENT
S20.pdf (630.6 kB)
DOCUMENT
S21.pdf (629.58 kB)
DOCUMENT
S22.pdf (490.87 kB)
1/0
33 files

Individual participant figures_Human variation in both error-based and reinforcement motor learning is associated with entorhinal volume

figure
posted on 2021-10-28, 16:17 authored by Anouk de BrouwerAnouk de Brouwer, Jason P. Gallivan
Each figure contains the raw data of one participant in the reinforcement motor learning task (cursor trajectories) and the error-based motor learning task (hand angles and reported aim angles), as well as the participant's performance relative to the distribution of learning measures included in the analysis.

In the reinforcement motor learning task, participants learned to copy multiple invisible, curved paths through trial and error, using only a reward score (0-100) presented at the end of each trial to improve their performance.

In the error-based learning task, participants had to adjust their movements to a 45° rotation of the cursor movement, which represented participants’ hand movements, in order to hit visual targets (visuomotor rotation task).

History

Usage metrics

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC