pone.0255580.g004.tif (196 kB)
HER2 IHC/FISH discrepancies.
figure
posted on 2021-09-23, 17:36 authored by Emanuele Caselli, Cristina Pelliccia, Valeria Teti, Guido Bellezza, Martina Mandarano, Ivana Ferri, Kerstin Hartmann, Mark Laible, Ugur Sahin, Zsuzsanna Varga, Chiara Lupi, Fabrizio Stracci, Angelo SidoniSchematic analysis of discrepancies in HER2: a. between the original assessment (ORI) and re-evaluation (REV) and b. between IHC (ORI) and RT-qPCR. Positive calls are indicated by red filled boxes. Negatives calls are presented in green and equivocal calls in grey, according to the 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines in force at the time of the study.
History
Usage metrics
Categories
Keywords
xlink "> hereinxlink "> determinationxlink "> decadeswider dynamic rangetraditional determination assaystissue block usingquality control effortsmammatyper &# 174least one callone case ).biomarkers expressions closeqpcr may offer96 discrepant casesxlink "> correlationthree study methodssubsequent independent manualrna expression dataimprove ki67 standardizationeither rev alone1 %) casesprinciple method usedeither equivocal resultsqpcr original ihc slidesautomated ihc assessmentsqpcr ).reliable biomarkerscomplementary method2 %)remain equivocalequivocal category28 casesihc ),routine methodsinvestigated discrepancieshigher reproducibilityfindings seemestrogen receptorendocrine responsivenesscomputational pathologycompares wellcategorized differentlybreast cancerbiomarker testing
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC