pone.0292449.g001.tif (883.82 kB)
Experimental design.
figure
posted on 2023-11-01, 17:22 authored by Mohammadreza Mahaki, Anina Moira van Leeuwen, Sjoerd M. Bruijn, Nathalie van der Velde, Jaap H. van DieënEach week consisted of two (training) sessions. In week 1, participants walked only on normal shoes. In weeks 2–4, they walked on normal shoes in the Normal walking and After-effect conditions, but on LesSchuh (Fig 2) in the Training condition (shaded blue area). In weeks 2–4, the widths of the ridges underneath the shoes were 2.0, 1.5 and 1.0 cm respectively. In week 6, we performed a retention test. We collected data during all sessions.
History
Usage metrics
Keywords
participants performed sixnarrow ridge underneathmass kinematic statemass helps usfoot placement errorsfeet accurately relativelocal dynamic stabilityoutcome measures maytraining session consistedobserved across sessionsfirst training sessiondiv >< psignificantly lower comparedfoot placement contrololder adults learnhealthy older adultsgait stability returnedconstrained repeated treadmill walkingnormal walking conditionolder adultstraining sessionstraining conditionimproved stabilitynormal walkingyoung adultsmeasures designtraining effectstraining effectsessions withineffect conditionwhilst walkingtwo millimeterssimilar levelsretention testprevent fallingpressure shiftsmechanisms beyondevaluated whetherdetermined whethercohen ’ankle moments875 ).394 ).
Licence
Exports
RefWorks
BibTeX
Ref. manager
Endnote
DataCite
NLM
DC