pone.0262128.g009.tif (747.32 kB)
DIDC and four-channel 10-fold cross-validation accuracy results.
figure
posted on 2022-01-21, 19:09 authored by Xinyu Zhang, Vincent C. S. Lee, Jia Rong, Feng Liu, Haoyu KongThe average 10-fold scores for each epochs were demonstrated using the black line, and the average testing accuracy for DIDC is 0.95, for four-channel is 0.94.
History
Usage metrics
Categories
Keywords
world data setsunreliable human falsethyroid cancer diagnosisthyroid cancer detectionsingle input dualmaking decisions regardingdouble inputs dualaided diagnosis techniquesaided diagnosis applicationspositive diagnostic ratesmachine learning techniquesbest fitting architecturediagnostic accuracy ratecomputed tomography scansclinicians 8217specific diagnostic designcomputed tomographyspecific designmortality ratesdeep learningchannel architecturespecific treatmentsultrasound imagestreatment protocolsreduce morbidityproposed frameworkprediction accuracypractical frameworklimitations dueincreased efficiencyfar lackingevaluation suggestschannel architecturesbase structure
Licence
Exports
RefWorksRefWorks
BibTeXBibTeX
Ref. managerRef. manager
EndnoteEndnote
DataCiteDataCite
NLMNLM
DCDC