pone.0296446.g005.tif (1 MB)

Comparison of overall survival between high- and low-risk groups.

figure

posted on 2024-01-05, 18:40 authored by Caixian Yu, Xiaoliu Wu, Shao Zhang, Lan Zhang, Hongping Zhang, Hongying Yang, Min Zhao, Zheng Li

A, training cohort; B, internal validation cohort; C, external validation cohort.

History

Usage metrics

PLOS ONE

Categories

Keywords

yunnan cancer hospital clinicopathological factors associated boost therapy effectively rank method test cox regression model center retrospective cohort 535 patients diagnosed 122 patients diagnosed univariate analysis showed chemotherapy &# 8805 7 %, respectively year overall survival nomogram predicting survival internal validation cohort seer database analysis univariate analysis survival analysis internal validation meier method validation cohort prognostic model practical model external validation risk patients dividing patients xlink ">tumor size successfully constructed subsequently created study aimed seer database prognostic influences precisely predicts neuroendocrine carcinomas methodologically analyze may benefit extremely rare extended application end results distant metastasis clinical trials clinical practice also recruited also found actual ones 4 cycles 05 ).

Licence

Exports

RefWorks

BibTeX

Ref. manager

Endnote

DataCite

NLM

DC