figshare
Browse
pcbi.1011018.g005.tif (388.77 kB)

Comparison of a policy ensuring all visitors must be effectively vaccinated but not having testing “effective visitor vaccination”) against other policies.

Download (388.77 kB)
figure
posted on 2024-01-18, 18:25 authored by Martin Grunnill, Julien Arino, Zachary McCarthy, Nicola Luigi Bragazzi, Laurent Coudeville, Edward W. Thommes, Amine Amiche, Abbas Ghasemi, Lydia Bourouiba, Mohammadali Tofighi, Ali Asgary, Mortaza Baky-Haskuee, Jianhong Wu

A: Boxplots of Total Infections and Hospitalisation under “effective visitor vaccination” (vA = vB = 1). B Boxplots of % relative differences in Total Infections and Hospitalisation seen under various testing regimes at differing levels of effective vaccination for visitors compared to “effective visitor vaccination” as a control. In B % relative differences are calculated between simulations made with the same Latin Hypercbe (LH) sample, see Eq 4. Testing regimes used in comparisons are “No Testing”, “Pre-Travel RT-PCR”, “Pre-Match RT-PCR”, “Pre-Match RA” or “RT-PCR then RA” testing regimes (see Table 7). Levels of effective vaccination for visitors in the comparisons are vA = vB = 0, vA = vB = 0.25, vA = vB = 0.5 and vA = vB = 0.75. The white dots on the boxplots represent mean values. All parameters other than those relating to effective vaccination for visitors (vA and vB) are drawn using LH sampling from distributions outlined in Tables 2, 3 and 5.

History