figshare
Browse
1/1
17 files

ShapeUML vs. ShapeVOWL study results

Version 2 2021-07-04, 15:08
Version 1 2021-01-20, 11:02
dataset
posted on 2021-07-04, 15:08 authored by Sven LieberSven Lieber
These files accompanied two user studies to compare how accurate users can answer questions about RDF constraints using the visual notations ShapeUML and ShapeVOWL.
The first initial user study covered the main questionnaire
and the second follow-up user study covered the follow-up questionnaire.

This dataset contains:
- A Jupyter notebook with the analysis
- Introductions to both notations, read by participants prior the main questionnaire
- Updated introductions to both notations, read by the participants prior the follow-up study questionnaire
- The main questionnaire provided to the users (export from LimeSurvey)
- The follow-up user study questionnaire provided to the users (export from LimeSurvey)
- Anonymized raw data containing the RDF constraint answers of participants
- Several CSV, YML, BASH and TURTLE files used for the qualitative analysis with RDF and SPARQL enabled by rml.io (see Jupyter notebook)

History

Usage metrics

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC