Table 5.xls (5.5 kB)
Model selection results for strength of spatial association mixed-effects model analyses.
dataset
posted on 2017-04-07, 17:58 authored by María Fernanda Mejía-Salazar, Anne W. Goldizen, Clementine S. Menz, Ross G. Dwyer, Simon P. Blomberg, Cheryl L. Waldner, Catherine I. Cullingham, Trent K. BollingerModels are ranked according to Akaike information criterion (AICc) and presented along with the delta (Δp, the change in AICc relative to the best model), and Akaike weights. Model 15 had a 99.99% chance of being the best model.
