Table 2.xls (9.5 kB)
Comparison of demographic features and TMS data of both patients and controls.
dataset
posted on 2021-12-16, 18:31 authored by Giuseppe Lanza, Francesco Fisicaro, Carmela Cinzia D’Agate, Raffaele Ferri, Mariagiovanna Cantone, Luca Falzone, Giovanni Pennisi, Rita Bella, Marios Hadjivassiliou, Manuela PennisiComparison of demographic features and TMS data of both patients and controls.
History
Usage metrics
Categories
Keywords
unveil preclinical impairmenttranscranial magnetic stimulationstatistically significant differenceresting motor thresholdmultifaceted clinical manifestationsmotor evoked potentialsmotor cortex resultedclear radiological abnormalitiesbrain computed tomographytwo interstimulus intervalssystemic diseases affectingpercentage amplitude ratiode novo cholinergic fibers withincentral nervous system8 ms ),unconditioned mep responsematched healthy controlsnewly diagnosed patientsovert cognitive impairmentmontreal cognitive assessmenttwo groups revealedlatency afferent inhibitionincidental gluten intakebrain ct ruled15 healthy controlshdrs ), respectivelycd patients comparedcd may complainspecific tms measurestwo groupsmep amplitudevivo systemic diseasecholinergic dysfunctioncentral acetylcholinecd patients15 consecutivemep responsescognitive symptomscognitive changessai ),xlink ">study basedspinal conductivitysignificantly worsepsychiatric disorderspreviously demonstratednormal dietneuropsychiatric symptomsneurophysiological techniquesneurophysiological correlatemight representinvasively probeintracranial calcificationsintracortical disinhibitionintestinal featuresfree dietexcitation stateeducational leveldiagnostic techniquesdiagnostic challengedepressive symptomscortical areascns ),clinically evidentceliac diseaseanthropometric featuresaetiology different
Licence
Exports
RefWorksRefWorks
BibTeXBibTeX
Ref. managerRef. manager
EndnoteEndnote
DataCiteDataCite
NLMNLM
DCDC