32B1 Phase 1 interviews

Background: Peer support groups are implemented globally, and viewed as a cost-effective, scalable platform for delivering health and nutrition programming. Quality is important for participation and achieving social and behavior change goals. Little research has explored the perspectives of peer group participants on quality.

Objectives: To learn how participants of a nutrition and health program define quality peer groups and how they suggest improving peer groups.

Methods: Community-based implementation research with in-depth interviews on experiences, benefits, and challenges were conducted with peer group participants of health and nutrition peer groups, including group members (n=64) and facilitators (n=30) in three districts in Zimbabwe. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically, and preliminary results were presented in six follow-up focus group discussions with interviewees to provide refine input on results and interpretation.