figshare
Browse
Figure_1.tif (741.98 kB)

Relaxation times and contrast of Mn-labeled MNCs.

Download (0 kB)
figure
posted on 2013-02-20, 13:56 authored by Kenichi Odaka, Ichio Aoki, Junji Moriya, Kaoru Tateno, Hiroyuki Tadokoro, Jeff Kershaw, Tohru Minamino, Toshiaki Irie, Toshimitsu Fukumura, Issei Komuro, Tsuneo Saga

(A) R1 and R2 calculated for the in vitro samples are presented. The pelleted 0.1 mM Mn-labeled MNCs showed larger R1 and R2 in comparison to the saline control. It was not possible to calculate the R1 and R2 values for the MNCs with 0.25 mM Mn-labeling and over (N/A) because the T2 was too short due to the large susceptibility effect. The R1s of the MnCl2 solutions were approximately linearly correlated with the Mn concentration. The R1 and R2 for the supernatant fluid were approximately independent of the initial Mn labeling concentration. (B) T1-weighted sagittal images of pelleted MNCs after suspension in 0, 0.1, 0.25, and 0.5 mM Mn solutions. The pelleted MNCs at 0.1 mM MnCl2-labeling showed partial signal enhancement in the T1-weighted 7 T MRI (arrow). The pelleted MNCs with MnCl2-labeling over 0.25 mM lost signal in comparison with the unlabeled (0 mM) control due to the very short T2 and the T2* susceptibility effect at 7 T. In the 0.2 T MRI, the the 0.1, 0.25 and 0.5 mM MnCl2-labeled MNCs showed positive contrast, although there may have been some signal loss at the base of the 0.5 mM sample.

History

Usage metrics

    PLOS ONE

    Categories

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC