figshare
Browse
Fig_6.tif (2.97 MB)

Performance comparison of the recovery rater for LMW proteins from human serum using optimized-DS, ProteoMiner and gel-filter methods.

Download (0 kB)
figure
posted on 2015-02-27, 03:57 authored by Lingsheng Chen, Linhui Zhai, Yanchang Li, Ning Li, Chengpu Zhang, Lingyan Ping, Lei Chang, Junzhu Wu, Xiangping Li, Deshun Shi, Ping Xu

A. Human serum proteome analyzed by the optimized-DS approach. On lane 1, 2 μL of untreated human serum was loaded. On lane 3, 10 μL of human serum was processed with the optimized-DS method after mixed with 0.3 μg regular GST protein. B. The human serum was processed with ProteoMiner method. On lane2, 2 μL of untreated human serum was saved as control as in A. On lane 3 (a) and 4 (b), 5% of eluates from the starting 200 μL of human serum sample treated with ProteoMiner was mixed with 0.1 or 0.3 μg of regular GST proteins and resolved on SDS-PAGE gel. C. Gel-filter analysis of human serum. On lane 2–4 (a-c), 10 μL of human serum samples were mixed with 0.3 μg of regular GST protein and analyzed by gel-filter method. On lane 4 (A) and 5 (B and C), 0.3 μg of regular GST protein alone was loaded as control.

History

Usage metrics

    PLOS ONE

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC