Figure_4.tif (4.47 MB)

Illustrates the comprehensive analyses of central proteins as potential drug targets.

figure

posted on 2012-07-11, 00:34 authored by Rohit Vashisht, Anupam Kumar Mondal, Akanksha Jain, Anup Shah, Priti Vishnoi, Priyanka Priyadarshini, Kausik Bhattacharyya, Harsha Rohira, Ashwini G. Bhat, Anurag Passi, Keya Mukherjee, Kumari Sonal Choudhary, Vikas Kumar, Anshula Arora, Prabhakaran Munusamy, Ahalyaa Subramanian, Aparna Venkatachalam, Gayathri S, Sweety Raj, Vijaya Chitra, Kaveri Verma, Salman Zaheer, Balaganesh J, Malarvizhi Gurusamy, Mohammed Razeeth, Ilamathi Raja, Madhumohan Thandapani, Vishal Mevada, Raviraj Soni, Shruti Rana, Girish Muthagadhalli Ramanna, Swetha Raghavan, Sunil N. Subramanya, Trupti Kholia, Rajesh Patel, Varsha Bhavnani, Lakavath Chiranjeevi, Soumi Sengupta, Pankaj Kumar Singh, Naresh Atray, Swati Gandhi, Tiruvayipati Suma Avasthi, Shefin Nisthar, Meenakshi Anurag, Pratibha Sharma, Yasha Hasija, Debasis Dash, Arun Sharma, Vinod Scaria, Zakir Thomas, Nagasuma Chandra, Samir K. Brahmachari, Anshu Bhardwaj

The various filters include comparison with validated drug targets, sequence and structural level comparison with Human proteome, gut and oral flora (a) The list of 73 central ORFs wherein Rv Ids in bold represent IPW central ORFs, Rv IDs in regular font represents IPWSI central ORFs and the italicized-bold represent common Rv Ids to both IPW and IPWSI. (b & b’) Five of the 17 IPW and six of 64 central ORFs with experimental validation as drug targets. (c) Sequence homology comparison with human proteome and human microbiome results in 62 ORFs with no significant similarity (d) Octamer analyses against human proteome and human microbiome results in one ORF with no hits (e) Comparative binding site analysis with human proteome results in 26 ORFs with no significant similarity (lists b, b’, c, d and e available in Table S2).