figshare
Browse
Fig_2.tif (1.16 MB)

Effect of crizotinib and alectinib on stimulus preference of retinal ganglion cells.

Download (0 kB)
figure
posted on 2015-08-13, 03:05 authored by Toshiyuki Ishii, Shunichiro Iwasawa, Ryota Kurimoto, Akemi Maeda, Yuichi Takiguchi, Makoto Kaneda

(A and B) Post-stimulus time histogram before (pre), during (crizotinib), and after (wash) the application of 1.0μM of crizotinib in an OFF-cell (A) and in an ON-OFF cell (B). The bin size for the histogram was 50 ms. (C and D) Cumulative distributions of the differences in SPI for crizotinib and alectinib. The difference in SPI was calculated from the SPI values evaluated before and during drug application. The cells were divided into “Decrease” type (C) and “Increase” type (D) according to the change in the SPI. The difference in (D) was an absolute value. (E and F) STA before (pre), during (crizotinib), and after (wash) the application of crizotinib in the cells shown in Figs 2A (E) and B (F). The amplitude “A” was defined as the difference in light intensity between the maximum and the minimum (double-headed arrow). (G and H) Plot of the amplitude “A” before (pre) and during drug application (drug) for the cells shown in Table 4. The cells were divided into “Decrease” type (G) and “Increase” type (H). **P < 0.01; *** P < 0.001; paired t-test.

History

Usage metrics

    PLOS ONE

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC