figshare
Browse
gcpi_a_1326106_sm3563.docx (2.06 MB)

Pelvic restraint cushion sled test evaluation of pelvic forward motion

Download (2.06 MB)
Version 2 2018-02-16, 21:44
Version 1 2017-11-03, 20:23
journal contribution
posted on 2018-02-16, 21:44 authored by Greg Shaw, David Lessley, Joseph Ash, Salvador Acosta, Sara Heltzel, Patrick Riley, Taewung Kim, Jeff Crandall

Objective: This study was designed to evaluate the performance of a pelvic restraint cushion (PRC), a submarining countermeasure that deploys under the thighs when a crash is detected in order to block the forward motion of the pelvis.

Methods: Sled tests approximating low- and high-speed frontal impacts were conducted with 4 female postmortem human subjects (PMHS) restrained by a lap and shoulder belt in the right front passenger seat. The subjects were tested with and without a PRC.

Results: The PRC is effective in reducing forward motion of the PMHS pelvis and reduces the risk of injury due to lap belt loading in a high-speed frontal crash.

Conclusions: Although small sample size limits the utility of the study's findings, the results suggest that the PRC can limit pelvic forward motion and that pelvic injury due to PRC deployment is not likely.

Funding

Hyundai Motor Company funded this study and provided the body-in-white and interior components needed to construct the test buck.

History

Usage metrics

    Traffic Injury Prevention

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC