figshare
Browse
rsos160991_si_001.docx (45.49 kB)

Information about thresholds Uploaded as ‘Supplementary material - thresholds.doc’; details breakdown of item thresholds by gender (as part of gender invariance analysis) from Social Reward Questionnaire–Adolescent Version and its association with callous–unemotional traits

Download (91.08 kB)
Version 2 2017-04-11, 06:38
Version 1 2017-04-03, 12:19
journal contribution
posted on 2017-04-11, 06:38 authored by Lucy Foulkes, Craig S. Neumann, Ruth Roberts, Eamon McCrory, Essi Viding
During adolescence, social interactions are a potent source of reward. However, no measure of social reward value exists for this age group. In this study, we adapted the adult Social Reward Questionnaire, which we had previously developed and validated, for use with adolescents. Participants aged 11–16 (n = 568; 50% male) completed the Social Reward Questionnaire—Adolescent version (SRQ-A), alongside measures of personality traits—five-factor model (FFM) and callous–unemotional (CU) traits—for construct validity purposes. A confirmatory factor analysis of the SRQ-A supported a five-factor structure (Comparative Fit Index = 0.90; Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.07), equating to five questionnaire subscales: enjoyment of Admiration, Negative Social Potency, Passivity, Prosocial Interactions and Sociability. Associations with FFM and CU traits were in line with what is seen for adult samples, providing support for the meaning of SRQ-A subscales in adolescents. In particular, adolescents with high levels of CU traits showed an ‘inverted’ pattern of social reward, in which being cruel is enjoyable and being kind is not. Gender invariance was also assessed and was partially supported. The SRQ-A is a valid, reliable measure of individual differences in social reward in adolescents.

History

Usage metrics

    Royal Society Open Science

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC