figshare
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Reason: the data in this proceedings is used in a manuscript under review

Genderless You-Narratives: The Pragmatics of ta in Chinese Social Media

conference contribution
posted on 2020-04-12, 19:35 authored by Kerry SluchinskiKerry Sluchinski
The 21st century is an era marked by an extensive and explicit interest in gender, identity, and social media across the world, and China is no exception despite it being labelled as the “World’s Worst Place to be Gay” (Ross, 2017). Through examining digital narratives in which Chinese social media users employ the genderless non-standard third person pronoun ta written using the Roman alphabet instead of the standard Chinese characters, the study sheds light on both contemporary language use and manipulation of gender constructions.

Mandarin Chinese originally used the single character 他 (ta ) to refer to the third person ‘he’, ‘she’, and ‘it’, which later gave way to three separate written “standard” forms: 他 (ta ‘he’), 她 (ta ‘she’), and 它 (ta ‘it’) all with the same pronunciation (see Chan, 2011). As a linguistic device that appears to be transferred from spoken language and designed to maximize the unique advantages of computer mediated communication (CMC), ta is at the forefront of understudied interpersonal dialogic practices with only two preliminary articles (Zhan, 2013; Zhong, 2015). The non-standard form ta thrives on the ability to obscure the gender of the intended referent by transferring its oral properties to written discourse. The study of ta is of particular importance with regards to its implications in Chinese CMC and advertising as its specific function and referent is defined, i.e. co-constructed, through writers’ usage and readers’ interpretation.

This research is part of the first systematic study which examines the textual and pragmatic usage of ta in Chinese CMC. Specifically, the research presented here adopts qualitative and quantitative methods in analyzing ta in context from celebrity status verified accounts on Chinese CMC platform Sina Weibo. With an inductive approach to research, the study examines the pragmatic function of ta in digital narratives and how ta contributes to the emergent narrative (Walsh, 2011) through combined narrative analysis frameworks (Bamberg, 1997; Richardson, 2006; Turk, 2011; Utell, 2016) with a focus on empathy (Keen, 2006). The study operates with the following working definition for “narrative” in the context of the CMC data used in the study: A narrative is a written text that serves the communicative purpose of recounting either fictional or non-fictional events, also referred to as stories, involving characters, where the characters’ emotions in relation to the event may or may not be explicitly addressed.

Adopting a constructivist approach to narrative analysis introduced in Squire et al. (2014:8), the study regards narratives as themes and ta as an interpersonal resource designed to facilitate the co-construction of emergent narratives based on empathy. Thus, as a primary performance-based, pragmatic approach to ta in narratives, the study draws on Bamberg’s (1997) adapted narrative analysis methodology based on positioning analysis to further explain how the factors of co-construction and empathy work together to facilitate the reader’s alignment with the character or situation presented in the text.

Preliminary observations reveal that celebrity status verified account users insert the gender unspecified ta into narratives with the function of soliciting empathy or alignment from readers. In order to achieve this function, ta is embedded in the following three prominent discourse types: 1) personal-narratives, 2) you-narratives, and 3) ta-narratives. Personal-narratives and ta-narratives are designed to seek empathy via character identification while you-narratives are designed to create situational empathy.

References:

Bamberg, M. (1997). Positioning between structure and performance. JOURNAL OF NARRATIVE AND LIFE HISTORY, 7(1–4), 335–342. Retrieved from http://login.ezproxy.library.ualberta.ca/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=edswah&AN=000071769800042&site=eds-live&scope=site

Chan, C. H. (2011). The Europeanization of modern written Chinese: a case study of the changing third person pronouns in the twentieth century and beyond. Bern: Peter Lang.

Keen, S. (2006). A Theory of Narrative Empathy. Narrative, 14(3), 207–236. Retrieved from
http://login.ezproxy.library.ualberta.ca/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=21644604&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Ross, E. (2017, June 26). THE WORLD'S WORST PLACE TO BE GAY? IT'S CHINA, ACCORDING TO NEW RANKING. Retrieved from https://www.newsweek.com/revealed-worlds-most-unwelcoming-city-gay-people-probably-not-where-you-629597

Squire, C., Andrews, M., Davis, M., Esin, C., Harrison, B., Hýden, L., & Hýden, M.(2014). What is narrative research?. London: Bloomsbury.

Turk, T. (2011). Intertextuality and the collaborative construction of narrative: J. M. Coetzee’s Foe. Narrative, (3), 295. Retrieved from http://login.ezproxy.library.ualberta.ca/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=congale&AN=edsgcl.270898897&site=eds-live&scope=site

Utell, J. (2016). Engagements with narrative. New York: Routledge.

Walsh, R. (2011). Emergent Narrative in Interactive Media. Narrative, 19(1), 72–85. Retrieved
fromhttp://login.ezproxy.library.ualberta.ca/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=57386164&site=ehost-live&scope=site

Zhan, X. H. 詹,秀华. (2013). 说 “TA”. “shou ‘TA’”[Let’s talk about “TA”] 廊坊师范学院学报(社会科学版)“Langfangshifanxueyuanxuebao (shehuikexue ban)” [ Journal of Langfang Teachers College(Social Sciences Edition)], 29(6), 36-38.

Zhong, Z. J.钟之静. (2015). 网络新词汇ta 的第三人称代词三分法意义的分析. “Wanglouxincihui ta de di san renchengdaici san fenfayiyi de fenxi”.[Analysis of the
three meanings of the third person pronoun new Internet word ta]湖北科技学院学报 “hubeijiaoxuexueyuanxuebao” [Journal of Hubei University of Science and Technology], 35(5), 77-79.

History

Usage metrics

    Licence

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC