Beyond Binaries: interrogating ancient DNA
In this paper we explore ancient DNA as a powerful new technique for archaeologists. We argue that for aDNA to reach its full potential we need to carefully consider its theoretical underpinnings. We suggest that at present much aDNA research rests upon two problematic theoretical assumptions: first, that nature and culture exist in binary opposition and that DNA is a part of nature; secondly, that cultures form distinct and bounded identities. The nature-culture binary, which underpins much aDNA research, is not only a misunderstanding of our world but also results in placing archaeology and material culture in a secondary and subservient position to science and aDNA. Viewing cultures as distinct and bounded creates exclusionary, simplistic, and singular identities for past populations. This stands in contrast to the work of social scientists, which has revealed identity to be complex, multiple, changing, and contradictory. We offer a new way forward drawing upon assemblage thinking and posthumanism. This allows us to consider the messy and complex nature of our world and of human identities, and demands that we expect equally messy and complex results to emerge when we bring aDNA into conversation with other forms of archaeological evidence.